Generic filters
Exact matches only
Filter by Categories
Bed Bug Treatments
Bee-Removal
Commercial Pest Control
Garden Pests and Lawn Pests
Open to the Public
Other Pests
Pest Control Ants
Ant Baits
Ant Research
Pest Control Birds
Pest Control Cockroaches
Cockroach Baits
Cockroach Research
Pest Control Equipment
Pest Control Fabric Pests
Pest Control Fleas
Pest Control Flies
Pest Control Mosquitoes
Pest Control Products
Pest Control Software
Pest Control Spiders
Pest Control Stored Product Pests
Pest Control Ticks
Pest Control Treatments
Pest Control Wasps
Professional Pest Manager Magazine
Rodent Control
Mouse traps and Rat Traps
Rat Bait and mouse bait
Rodent Research
Running a pest control business
Insurance
Sales and Marketing
Training
Termite and Pest Inspections
Termite Professional magazine
Termite Research
Termite Treatment
Baits
Pre-construction
Soil treatment
Filter by content type
Taxonomy terms

TERMITE EVOLUTION

A look at the latest research on the origins of the termites, including their classification and the termite/gut symbiont relationship.

Latest termite evolution research

Where do Coptotermes sit?

Classification of termites is somewhat problematic. Indeed, it was not until relatively recently that it was agreed that termites had evolved from an ancient line of cockroaches. For the Rhinotermitidae, the family of lower termites which includes many of the economically important subterranean termites, the classification challenges remain. Currently the family includes six generally accepted sub-families, 12 genera and 335 species. However, due to the wide-ranging morphological differences between the species, there is ongoing debate and research as to the relatedness of the species.

Typically termites have been split into lower termites and higher termites, based on their differences in gut symbionts, feeding behaviour, colony structure and development pathways. Although Coptotermes species have typically been classified as lower termites, as they still possess protozoa symbionts, they display many higher termite behaviours.

 

Coptotermes and heterotermes termites
There is good argument that Coptotermes (left) and Heterotermes (right) should be considered as a separate family (photo credit for right-hand image: Noel Parminter).

 

Researchers have recently reviewed ten species of the lower termite genera, including Coptotermes, Reticulitermes, Heterotermes and Schedorhinotermes and compared their morphologies and mitochondrial genes to various higher termite species.1 Their findings suggested that although Heterotermes and Reticulitermes are currently classified under the Heterotermitinae sub-family, Heterotermes appear to be more closely related to Coptotermes.

However, generally speaking the Heterotermitinae and Coptotermitinae sub-families were more closely related to each other than to other sub-families in the Rhinotermitidae. And furthermore that this Coptotermitidae-Heterotermitinae clade is actually more closely related to the higher termites (Termitidae) than to the other sub-families of the Rhinotermitidae. As such they should be considered the more evolved clade in the Rhinotermitidae family and consequently seen as a separate family. The genetic analysis supports the behavioural observations that Coptotermes (and Heterotermes) do indeed sit between lower and higher termites.

 

Eusociality and termite hygiene

One of the key steps in the evolution of termites was the move from nesting and foraging in dead wood to developing a central nest and foraging outside the nest for food. This change in behaviour meant termites needed protection from the large number of harmful microbes they encounter in the soil. Researchers have established that this protection was delivered by a range of social grooming and hygiene behaviours, which included the secretion of salivary enzymes that are particularly effective in dealing with the common and deleterious Metarhizium fungus.2 As this behavioural benefit of eusociality delivered hygiene benefits, the selection pressure on internal (innate) components of the immune system decreased.


References

1 Ke, Yunling & Huang, Fusheng & Wu, Wenjing & Li, Zhi-Qiang. (2021). Systematic Position of Heterotermitinae and Coptotermitinae (Blattodea: Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Journal of Entomological Science. 56. 10.18474/JES20-53.

2 Bulmer, Mark & Stefano, Alanna. (2022). Termite eusociality and contrasting selective pressure on social and innate immunity. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 76. 10.1007/s00265-021-03090-5.

 

Termite Professional Australian edition, 2021

Gut symbionts are integral to the success of termites as a group, enabling them to be one of the few groups of animals capable of successfully digesting cellulose. Ongoing studies have unravelled some of the mysteries of this symbiotic relationship and its role in the evolution of termites.

 

Evolution in lower termites

Lower termites are more ‘primitive’ termites and include Mastotermes as well as the dampwood and drywood termites. The Rhinotermitidae are also classed as lower termites, but they are a more recent evolution, exhibiting some higher termite behaviours.

The gut symbionts in termites die prior to the termite moulting. So how are these gut symbionts retained within a termite population and how did such a relationship evolve? Christine Nalepa from North Carolina State University in the US has proposed a new hypothesis.1

Lower termites and their closest living cockroach ancestor, the sub-social wood-feeding cockroach Cryptocercus, both contain flagellate eukaryotic protists as their gut symbionts to aid with the digestion of wood. In Cryptocercus these symbionts form cysts prior to the cockroach moulting. These cysts are viewed as an evolutionary artefact, with the flagellates in Cryptocercus having evolved from parasitic flagellates of gregarious cockroaches, which form cysts to be passed in faeces and subsequently ingested by other cockroaches.

 

Cryptocercus, or the brown hooded cockroach, is the termite’s closest living cockroach relative

 

However, in Cryptocercus these cysts play no demonstrable role in the transmission of flagellates between nestmates and between generations. Instead the gut symbionts are passed directly from parents to offspring through feeding on hindgut secretions (proctodeal trophallaxis).

The hypothesis proposes that it was the change in behaviour in ancient social cockroaches, in moving from coprophagy to proctodeal feeding, that was critical in the development of the termite lineage. Not only did this accelerate parental care and increased social behaviour, but it also drove the evolution of the flagellates from a parasitic relationship to a mutualistic one.

 

Evolution of higher termites

Higher termites, the Termitidae, consist of the most recent species from an evolutionary point of view, including Microcerotermes and Nasutitermes.

Whilst lower termites rely on symbiotic protists to digest wood, higher termites (Termitidae) lack these flagellates altogether. With 70% of termite species being in the Termitidae family, the loss of protists is seen as a major evolutionary step in the development of termites. Instead of protists, higher termites have a range of bacteria and other gut symbionts to aid with digestion. Researchers believe that this change in gut symbionts drove this speciation through variation in diet, behaviour and morphology, allowing higher termites to utilise a wider range of niches.2

Although the mechanisms that drove this evolution remain speculative, a review paper on the subject provides two drivers for the evolution of the higher termites. Although lower termites feed primarily on wood, 85% of higher termites are classed as soil feeders, feeding on rotten wood and decomposed vegetable matter in the soil. By switching to a soil diet it would have starved the specialist protist symbionts of their source of cellulose and therefore eliminated them from the gut.

However, within the higher termites there are two groups of wood feeders – the Macrotermitinae and Sphaerotermitinae – which have also lost their cellulose digesting protist. They manage to ‘digest’ the wood outside of their bodies using fungi (Termitomyces) in the case of Macrotermitinae (main picture, above) or bacterial combs in the case of Sphaerotermitinae.

It’s not known which of these developments occurred first or whether they occurred independently, but they certainly provided the platform for the diversification and success of the higher termites.

More termite information

References

1 Nalepa, C.A., 2020. Origin of Mutualism Between Termites and Flagellated Gut Protists: Transition From Horizontal to Vertical Transmission. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00014

2 Chouvenc, T., Sobotnik, J., Engel, M.S., Bourguignon, T., 2021. Termite evolution: mutualistic associations, key innovations, and the rise of Termitidae. CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES 78, 2749–2769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-020-03728-z

Further reading:

How did termites spread across the world as they started to evolve?

How did the termite gut microflora develop as termites evolved?